[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Automatically checking regtests (was: Re: Minor releases?)
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Automatically checking regtests (was: Re: Minor releases?) |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:35:05 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 05:17:08PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Am Montag, 17. August 2009 16:08:36 schrieb Michael Käppler:
> >
> > > (nobody checks the regression tests for each release, for example
> > > -- and that's trivially done with a web browser!)
> >
> > That reminds me of an idea I recently had: Wouldn't it be possible to
> > automatically generate a sort of "checksum" for each regression-test
> > output-file and compare it with the former releases?
>
> Isn't this exactly what we already have (make test-baseline to create the
> reference version and then "make test" to compare the new output to the
> reference output...). For the results see
> http://lilypond.org/test/
> The 2.13.3 results are at:
> http://lilypond.org/test/v2.13.3-0/compare-v2-13/index.html)
Yes. Right now there happen to be a lot, but I think there's
generally around a dozen examples.
> Graham was referring to the fact that nobody seem to bother about looking at
> those automatically-created regression results before or after a release.
Yes. All it takes is bookmarking the site, checking it whenever
there's a release, and reporting any broken examples. However,
nobody is willing to commit to do this. 15 minutes whenever
there's a release, which happens at most once every two weeks.
Cheers,
- Graham