lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CG Information on Snippet Handling


From: Graham Percival
Subject: Re: CG Information on Snippet Handling
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 11:43:29 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 11:55:31PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
> Another option (though still not ideal since it suffers from the same
> formatting issues as pasting snippets verbatim from input/new ->
> input/lsr) is to use the same name for the regtest as the new snippet,
> then the docs will automatically pick up the regtest version if
> there's no input/lsr version.

No no no.  We used to do this, but it's a bad idea.  The
requirements of documentation and regression testing are
difference, but if you tie them together (even temporarily) then
you're always tempted to make the regtest more documentation-ish.
I want to keep a hard wall between these two areas.

Cheers,
- Graham




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]