[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Documentation of music functions
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: Documentation of music functions |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Nov 2008 15:49:06 +0100 |
2008/11/5 Carl D. Sorensen <address@hidden>:
> Thanks for answering my questions. So I guess that developers should write
> the doc strings without the _i, and the translators will add the _i when
> they translate the doc string?
... Or developers can write doc strings with _i anyway, just in case
someone wants to translate them at some later point. That being said,
I can't remember having seen any Scheme function localized yet
(whereas the C++ code it generally well localized, though not
necessarily translated).
> I wasn't asking for this documentation in the NR, but it needs to be
> somewhere, IMO.
As a matter of fact, doc strings for music-functions are currently not
gathered anywhere AFAICT (unlike markup commands, or instance). So
localizing them or not doesn't really matter; moreover
automatically-generated doc pages (such as the IR and NR Appendices)
will probably never be translated (not in decades to come, at least).
Cheers,
Valentin
- Documentation of music functions, Carl D. Sorensen, 2008/11/05
- Re: Documentation of music functions, Valentin Villenave, 2008/11/05
- Re: Documentation of music functions, Carl D. Sorensen, 2008/11/05
- Re: Documentation of music functions,
Valentin Villenave <=
- Re: Documentation of music functions, Carl D. Sorensen, 2008/11/05
- Re: Documentation of music functions, Neil Puttock, 2008/11/05
- Re: Documentation of music functions, John Mandereau, 2008/11/05
- Re: Documentation of music functions, Neil Puttock, 2008/11/06
- Re: Documentation of music functions, Carl D. Sorensen, 2008/11/06
- Re: Documentation of music functions, Francisco Vila, 2008/11/06