[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Status of manuals
From: |
Andrew Hawryluk |
Subject: |
Re: Status of manuals |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:21:28 -0600 |
Sounds good. I'll read through NR 1.5 and 1.6 next week.
Andrew
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Patrick McCarty <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 02:02:21PM -0600, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
>> I'd be up for some reviewing. I'm still new enough at LilyPond that
>> I'd learn a lot from some 'assigned readings' and I could probably
>> tell if they make sense to someone that doesn't compile their own
>> LilyPond binaries over breakfast.
>
> This literally made me laugh, since I think this description applies
> to me. :-) Thanks, Andrew.
>
> If you would like to review NR 1.6, that would be great. I am done
> with the main docs in this section now (in git), but not the snippets
> sections, so just ignore those for now. Once Reinhold rebuilds the
> docs on his site, my latest changes will show up.
>
> Thanks,
> Patrick
>
- Re: Status of manuals, (continued)
- Re: Status of manuals, Andrew Hawryluk, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Trevor Daniels, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Andrew Hawryluk, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Trevor Daniels, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Carl D. Sorensen, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Patrick McCarty, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Trevor Daniels, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Patrick McCarty, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals,
Andrew Hawryluk <=
Re: Status of manuals, Trevor Daniels, 2008/09/12