[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: erroneous subheading
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: erroneous subheading |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Jul 2008 17:26:34 +0100 |
Hi Jean-Charles
I used "simulating" because this way of doing it is really rather a hack.
A bit like replacing a staccato note with a half-length note followed by
a half-length rest. Both methods render the required music more or
less correctly in MIDI.
Doing it "for real" would be for LilyPond to interpret the fermata and the
staccato *as notated* and render them correctly in MIDI without having
to mess around like this. *That* would be "performing a fermata",
but current versions of Lily can't do this :(
Trevor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jean-Charles Malahieude" <address@hidden>
To: "Graham Percival" <address@hidden>; "lilypond-devel"
<address@hidden>
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2008 9:57 PM
Subject: GDP: erroneous subheading
Hi Graham!
May I object that the naming of the paragraph dealing about "simulating a
fermata" in tweaks.itely (section further tweaking), is totally wrong,
since the glyph is printed AND rendered in the MIDI output? It should
rather be, in my opinion, something like "performing a fermata".
Cheers,
Jean-Charles
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel