[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \times vs. \tuplet
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: \times vs. \tuplet |
Date: |
Sun, 09 Dec 2007 23:20:44 -0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) |
Paul Scott escreveu:
> Would it be unreasonable to simply add \tuplet as code/macro that would
> call or use \times? That way those of us who are not confused by \times
> can use it and those who prefer \tuplet can use that.
>
That would not work; functions cannot take rational (eg. 2/3) arguments.
You could have \tuplet #'(2 . 3) but that does not simplify lilypond syntax.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, (continued)
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Valentin Villenave, 2007/12/09
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/12/09
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Mats Bengtsson, 2007/12/12
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Valentin Villenave, 2007/12/12
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Mats Bengtsson, 2007/12/12
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Graham Percival, 2007/12/12
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Valentin Villenave, 2007/12/23
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Paul Scott, 2007/12/09
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Paco Vila, 2007/12/09
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Paul Scott, 2007/12/09
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Paul Scott, 2007/12/09
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Graham Percival, 2007/12/09
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Paul Scott, 2007/12/09
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Graham Percival, 2007/12/09
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Paul Scott, 2007/12/09
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2007/12/08
Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Till Rettig, 2007/12/08