On 12/14/06, Graham Percival <address@hidden> wrote:
Joe Neeman wrote:
> Could you have a look at the section on skyline vertical placement
> that I wrote? I think, btw, that "skyline vertical placement"
isn't
> a good name for this node. The only reason I call it "skyline" in
> the first place is that it uses a skyline algorithm but that isn't
> really relevant for the user. Does anyone have a better idea
for the
> name?
Having read the docs, how about "Vertical collision avoidance" ?
Or even "Vertical optimization".