Re: another skyline issue

[Werner LEMBERG]

> [...] there are a couple of points.  First, I don't think that the
> rehearsal mark slope should be almost infinite.  In the first of
> your examples, it would cause the rehearsal mark to move all the way
> down to the staff where it would be hard to find quickly.

Well, I used boxed rehearsal number, and the behaviour you've just
described is exactly what I want.  Due to the boxes the marks are
sufficiently pronounced.

> Also, it will be easier for implementation to make the "weight" just
> be the max-slope of the skylines.

Yep.

> In fact, the easiest thing implementation-wise (and therefore the
> one that I'll do first) is to make max-slope configurable but on an
> axis-group by axis-group level as opposed to grob by grob.

I don't understand this but it sounds great :-) Actually, I'm *very*
pleased with the default positioning of lilypond -- it's worth to name
it `lilypond 3' IMHO -- and I'm already going into the very (nasty)
details.  Good work, indeed!


    Werner