[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: doc branching
From: |
Cameron Horsburgh |
Subject: |
Re: doc branching |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Apr 2006 22:16:09 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060228) |
Graham Percival wrote:
>
> On 8-Apr-06, at 4:01 AM, Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
>
>> Graham Percival wrote:
>>
>>> manual, I'll be doing them all at once, so I won't miss anything. I
>>> think we still have features introduced in 2.2 that haven't made it into
>>> the manual (I'll be calling for a volunteer to do this soon).
>>
>> I'll have a bit of time over the next week--I'm willing to have a look
>> through the last few NEWS files (2.0 on?) and compare them with the
>> current (2.9 ?) manual. Any objections?
>
> Great! Yes, 2.9 is still the most recent manual.
>
> There's two parts to this job. First, identify which things aren't in
> the manual which should be. Second, write the docs for those new
> things. :)
>
> I already know that the following things should be included but aren't:
> \killCues
> setAboveContext (or something like this)
> nested staff delimiters --
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-11/msg00771.html
>
>
> Cheers,
> - Graham
>
>
>
Bewdy mate. I'll get a start on the first part and submit a list of what
I think needs to be done and where in the manual I think it should go. I
hope to do this in the next day or two.
Then for part two!
I notice that the doc tarball is 2.9.2 but the web page is 2.9.0. Is
there any non-trivial difference between the two?
Cam
- Re: doc branching, (continued)
- Re: doc branching, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/04/05
- Re: doc branching, Pedro Kröger, 2006/04/05
- Re: doc branching, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/04/05
- Re: doc branching, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/04/05
- Re: doc branching, Johannes Schindelin, 2006/04/05
- Re: doc branching, Graham Percival, 2006/04/05
- Re: doc branching, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/04/05
- Re: doc branching, Graham Percival, 2006/04/05
Re: doc branching, Cameron Horsburgh, 2006/04/08
- Re: doc branching, Graham Percival, 2006/04/08
- Re: doc branching,
Cameron Horsburgh <=