Re: implementation plan for music streams

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

Erik Sandberg wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 April 2006 20.46, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > > I'd start with 4. because they're independent from the rest, and we can
> > > readily test the rest of those.
>
> The reason for my ordering, is that 3 can be used to verify that 4 works.
>
> BTW, (1-3) are completely independent of (4), and I have just finished step 
> (1) locally. If you insist on getting (4) done before (1), then that's 
> perfectly OK with me; but is it OK for you to look at my patch for (1) while 
> I do (4)? I guess (1) is the step which requires the longest discussion, so 
> it might be good to start the discussion early.

If you have a working patch, let's see it.


--

Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen

LilyPond Software Design
 -- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com