lilypond-auto
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #3692 Fingerin


From: Auto mailings of changes to Lily Issues via Testlilyissues-auto
Subject: [Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #3692 Fingering collision with accidentals
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2018 13:36:06 -0000

Diff:

--- old
+++ new
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+http://codereview.appspot.com/341470043
+
 *Originally created by:* *anonymous

 *Originally created by:* address@hidden(http://code.google.com/u/101609726059656965678/)

[issues:#3692] Fingering collision with accidentals

Status: Started
Created: Sat Nov 30, 2013 09:17 AM UTC by Anonymous
Last Updated: Sat Sep 08, 2018 01:33 PM UTC
Owner: Torsten Hämmerle
Attachments:

http://codereview.appspot.com/341470043

Originally created by: *anonymous

Originally created by: address@hidden

Fingerings do not take accidentals into account, and fingerings align over the first note inout of a chord, rather than centering over the whole chord.
\version "2.17.96"

{
  <e'' f'' cis'''>1 ^1^2^5
}

From Keith Ohara:
"Unfortunately this is a different bug -- or two -- so it will
not be fixed at the same time as collisions between Fingerings.

(1) LilyPond has never looked at Accidentals when placing Fingering;
until recently that caused only small overlaps with sharps because
the Fingering did not previously fit so close to the chord.

(2) Fingering on a chord as a whole should center over the main column
of note-heads; instead it centers over the first-input note.

So, you can do the same as we did when using version 2.12: rearrange
the order of pitches in the chord so a main-column note comes first.

{ <f'' e'' cis'''>1 ^1^2^5 }

***********
From Janek :

This is similar to issues
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2245
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2451
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2452

and i believe to solve it in a general way we would have to teach
lilypond about different kinds of extents - see:

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2012-06/msg00230.html
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3239 (sorry, that
issue got pretty messy).

Currently the work i started on this is waiting until 2.18.0 is out...
What about leaving it for now and attacking this together after 2.18?
************
Possibly a Known Issue in NR 1.7.1 would be in order.


Sent from sourceforge.net because address@hidden is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.

_______________________________________________
Testlilyissues-auto mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]