|
From: | Auto mailings of changes to Lily Issues |
Subject: | [Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] Ticket 3445 discussion |
Date: | Tue, 16 Aug 2016 16:55:18 +0000 |
Diff:
The described problem with defect slurs in the 2.17 NR was exposed by issue 2240 (it defected in-chord slurs previous to that) and has been fixed in issue 4009.
Ties are fixed in issue 4956, so I am marking this as duplicate.
[issues:#3445] \retrograde should move the notes to their new location when clef is changed
Status: Duplicate
Created: Sun Jul 07, 2013 01:33 PM UTC by Anonymous
Last Updated: Sun Jul 07, 2013 01:33 PM UTC
Owner: David Kastrup
Originally created by: *anonymous
Originally created by: address@hidden
Report:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2013-06/msg00082.html
% If a clef is changed in retrograde it only prints the new clef
% It does not move the notes to their new locations on the staff
% All notes here are the same pitch but during clef changes it is printed
% incorrectly
\relative c' {
c1 % printed correctly
\retrograde {
c %printed correctly
\clef treble
c %printed as though in bass clef
\clef treble
c % Should be one ledger line above not below the staff in bass clef
\clef bass
c % Correctly printed in the assumed Treble clef
}
}
Comment from Harm:
\retrograde was implemented in 2.13.x
See
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/changes-big-page.html
There you can read:
"A minimal composer toolkit of modal transformations is provided. A
motif may be transposed, inverted and/or converted to its retrograde
within any scale."
This should be read as: "A composer toolkit, with minimal functionality." ;)
In 2.17.-NR
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/changing-multiple-pitches#retrograde
you can read
"Known issues and warnings
Manual ties inside \retrograde will be broken and generate warnings. ... "
Though not only Ties are broken. As the Nr-example shows Slurs are not
printed. Hairpins will return warnings, every simple \override will
lead to surprising results, setting clef-changes (much more complex,
than a simple \override), too.
So far I've tested.
So yes, \retrograde should be improved.
I'd call it an enhancement-request.
Sent from sourceforge.net because address@hidden is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list address@hidden https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |