lilypond-auto
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #4765 Multiple


From: Auto mailings of changes to Lily Issues
Subject: [Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #4765 Multiple beams too close to notehead
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:34:11 +0000

Thanks for adding the tracker item.

The discussion at https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2016-02/msg00000.html contains further considerations about the proper distance. Maybe the to-be-extended length should be modified and made slightly smaller in some cases. However, currently it seems impossible to achieve the best results, even with manual overrides. It seems the beam quanting code prevents several constellations, among them the desired one.

In general I'd summarize:
The distance of a semiquaver beam is usually correct by default. But with a third beam (and more) the inner beam should be identical to the semiquaver, and additional beams have to be added to the outside (I haven't inspected the code yet, but it seems this should be the way to go).

Maybe I will work on that if I should successfully finish the beaming pattern rewrite.


[issues:#4765] Multiple beams too close to notehead

Status: New
Created: Fri Feb 05, 2016 02:26 PM UTC by Palmer Ralph
Last Updated: Fri Feb 05, 2016 02:26 PM UTC
Owner: nobody
Attachments:

Urs Liska wrote :

I've always found that beams with three or more beams look too tight,
but now reading Gould, p. 19 confirms that, and I consider this a
type-ugly bug:

According to Gould outer beams starting with the third should move away
from the notehead, and "beams should never be closer to the notehead
than the correct position of the semiquaver beam (2 1/2 spaces)".

Attached you'll find examples for three and four beams, and I expect
this to continue with more beams. I have colored the ones too close in
red and adjusted them (blue) to Gould's minimum distance.
It seems:


Sent from sourceforge.net because address@hidden is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Testlilyissues-auto mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]