Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 4290 in lilypond: Patch: Make Grob::name accessible to Scheme

[lilypond]

Comment #3 on issue 4290 by address@hidden: Patch: Make Grob::name  
accessible to Scheme
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4290

I had a look in my files where I used a definition for 'grob-name' (more  
than 30 times I defined it) and it's use-cases.
Mostly I compare with an other grob-name.
Comparing via eq? is faster than equal? or string=?

In 'all-grob-descriptions' the grob-name is a symbol.

This would point to a symbol as output.

Otoh and just trying to be thoroughly, you could let it as is and write  
another definiton in lily-library.ly to convert it.
A similiar case is 'ly:stencil-in-color' taking single list-entries for a  
rgb-color and 'stencil-with-color' from stencil.scm taking a predefined  
color.
(Ok, not exactly the same case, but two function aiming the same, taking  
different kind of arguments)


Nevertheless, all in all I'd vote for outputting a symbol.

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings