[Lilypond-auto] Issue 3992 in lilypond: Using dodecaphonic and dodecaphonic-no-repeat there is no difference

[lilypond]

Status: Accepted
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Ugly

New issue 3992 by address@hidden: Using dodecaphonic and  
dodecaphonic-no-repeat there is no difference
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3992

> > Am 05.07.2014 15:50, schrieb Jean-Charles Malahieude:
> > > Hi all,

...


> > > Look at the two successive examples in NR-1.1.3 Automatic accidentals,  
> > > both styles dodecaphonic and dodecaphonic-no-repeat: there is no  
> > > difference at all.


On 05/07/14 18:13, Urs Liska wrote:


> > That's right, this is a bug, and I will look into it. I'm not on the  
> > right PC to check right now, but I strongly assume it's an issue with  
> > the doc example and not with the accidental style.

...

> It seems this accidental-style is actually broken.
> The doc example is coded correctly, and testing the accidentalstyle in a  
> document turns out the same result.

> I know that it worked correctly when we added it, so it must have been  
> broken later.
> So it should be added as a bug.

> To avoid misunderstandings:

> cis d cis cis d

> should print as

> cis! d! cis! \once \omit Accidental cis d!


> Urs

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings