Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 298 in lilypond: Ties do not appear when shortened because of an accidental

[lilypond]

Comment #10 on issue 298 by address@hidden: Ties do not appear when  
shortened because of an accidental
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=298

Thanks for pointing this out. It's true, the tie between the 2nd and 3rd C,  
though it might be too high, is no longer absent, as it was in post #3.  
That's an improvement, and suggests that ties might no longer become too  
short by avoiding accidentals -- which is the explicit subject of this  
issue 298 (but not of issues 840 and 1219 which have been merged into it).

Though I haven't re-tested it, I see no reason to think that ties might not  
still become too short by avoiding flags. I argued (in post #8) that this  
is true even in examples like #2 or #9 (referring to the tie between the  
1st and 2nd C), but I think the severity of the ties-too-short issue would  
increase from "enhancement" to "defect" if there were a line-break at the  
first barline in #9 -- as previously demonstrated in a similar example here:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1219#c8

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings