lilypond-auto
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3279 in lilypond: space consecutive tempo mark


From: lilypond
Subject: Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3279 in lilypond: space consecutive tempo marks
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 07:49:21 +0000

Updates:
        Labels: -Type-Enhancement -Patch-abandoned Type-Ugly Patch-new

Comment #31 on issue 3279 by address@hidden: space consecutive tempo marks
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3279

Let's try this again.

Re: comment 25 on the RehearsalMark, the compromise (between satisfying issue 1150 and reducing the incidence of needing to raise mark above a tempo) is no longer a compromise. The output agrees with the evidence of common practice shown in issue 1150. Users wanting different from common practice can override.

Collisions are resolved horizontally when possible (in the image, [Mark] PiĆ¹ mosso) and vertically ([D] Meno Mosso) if that is the only way to honor the alignment specified according to the documented break-alignment-interface (link to manual above).

Re: comment 25 on the "Larghissimo", the current patch goes back to textbook rules. Users wanting different can override as in comment #16. The location where the first note 'would be' is the location where a note appears when another staff is added (image).

Re: implementing a half-flawed solution. The half-flawed solution is already implemented; this patch merely changes the defaults so that we can use the half (more like 80%) that works. Sophisticated users are resorting to fractional spacer rests <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2013-02/msg00075.html> to solve the same issue.

http://codereview.appspot.com/8189043/

Attachments:
        tempo.ly  988 bytes
        tempo.jpg  27.2 KB

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]