[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 2522 in lilypond: duration*0 considered harmfu
From: |
lilypond |
Subject: |
Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 2522 in lilypond: duration*0 considered harmful |
Date: |
Sun, 13 May 2012 17:29:47 +0000 |
Comment #5 on issue 2522 by address@hidden: duration*0 considered harmful
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2522
Ok, in the \footnote issue 2505 there is an example with a breath mark.
That looks something like
\breath c4\footnote #'BreathMark ...
for getting a footnote to the breathmark. Ugh. This could be done with
\breath <>\footnote #'BreathMark ...
but it would also be feasible to make a function taking _one_ postevent like
post = #(define-music-function (parser location ev) (post-event?) #{ <>$ev
#})
and say \breath \post\footnote #'...
In contrast to <>, it would only accept a single postevent. And I can't
think of a really good macro name. \now\footnote does not convey the
problem that there is only one postevent acceptable.