[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Libunwind-devel] Updated fast trace patch with initial performance
|
From: |
Arun Sharma |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Libunwind-devel] Updated fast trace patch with initial performance results |
|
Date: |
Mon, 4 Apr 2011 21:01:38 -0700 |
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Paul Pluzhnikov <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Fortunately, all Linux/x86_64 systems support __thread, which doesn't suffer
> from the same problem.
>
> Is there a particular reason you didn't use __thread?
> If not, I'll send a patch.
Could you also add a test case to Ltest-nomalloc, so we catch any
mallocs in the fast unwind path? Thanks.
-Arun