[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libunwind] unwinding through dynamically modified code?
From: |
David Mosberger |
Subject: |
Re: [libunwind] unwinding through dynamically modified code? |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:12:01 -0800 |
>>>>> On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:36:41 -0600 (CST), Todd L Miller <address@hidden>
>>>>> said:
Todd> I've hacked this into a local copy of libunwind, and
Todd> started to insert the _U_dyn_op* calls to build the regions.
Todd> Quick question: do I use 'UNW_IA64_SP' or 'UNW_IA64_GR + 12'
Todd> when I'm talking about the stack pointer? The former seems to
Todd> refer to something different than the latter.
UNW_IA64_SP is what you want to use. UNW_IA64_GR+12 only tells you
about the last time the stack-pointer was saved, which is hardly
useful.
--david
- Re: [libunwind] unwinding through dynamically modified code?, (continued)
- Re: [libunwind] unwinding through dynamically modified code?, Todd L Miller, 2004/03/26
- Re: [libunwind] unwinding through dynamically modified code?, David Mosberger, 2004/03/26
- [libunwind] multiple dynamic list-info addresses?, Todd L Miller, 2004/03/29
- [libunwind] Re: multiple dynamic list-info addresses?, David Mosberger, 2004/03/29
- [libunwind] Re: multiple dynamic list-info addresses?, Todd L Miller, 2004/03/30
- [libunwind] Re: multiple dynamic list-info addresses?, David Mosberger, 2004/03/30
- [libunwind] Re: multiple dynamic list-info addresses?, Todd L Miller, 2004/03/31
- [libunwind] Re: multiple dynamic list-info addresses?, David Mosberger, 2004/03/31
- [libunwind] Re: multiple dynamic list-info addresses?, Todd L Miller, 2004/03/31
Re: [libunwind] unwinding through dynamically modified code?, Todd L Miller, 2004/03/23
Message not availableMessage not availableRe: [libunwind] unwinding through dynamically modified code?, Todd L Miller, 2004/03/24