[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TODO
From: |
Noah Misch |
Subject: |
Re: TODO |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Nov 2004 11:02:01 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 10:44:33PM +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> Strictly speaking automake does not know these dependencies. It
> knows some dependencies, but because of the possibility to
> AC_SUBST variables for conditional linking, and doest not know
> exactly all of them (think libfoo_la_DEPENDENCIES = @SOME_LA@).
> However these dependencies are indeed known later at make time.
I had forgotten. Bother.
> Noah> If Automake generated an install target for installable
> Noah> product, just as it generated a build target, would that
> Noah> not solve this problem?
>
> This sounds appealing, but wouldn't this imply that if two
> libraries depends on another one, the later will be installed
> twice?
Time stamp files would prevent that, but I don't know offhand how to handle
@FOO@ cleanly. I'll play with a few ideas. Thanks for the feedback.
Re: TODO, Noah Misch, 2004/11/10
- Re: TODO, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/10
- Re: TODO, Noah Misch, 2004/11/10
- Re: TODO, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/10
- Re: TODO, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/11/10
- Re: TODO, Noah Misch, 2004/11/10
- Re: TODO, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/10
Re: TODO, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/11/10
Re: TODO,
Noah Misch <=
Re: TODO, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/11/15