[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU Libtool 1.5.2 released
From: |
Scott James Remnant |
Subject: |
Re: GNU Libtool 1.5.2 released |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 10:36:46 +0000 |
On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 01:35, Daniel Reed wrote:
> On 2004-01-28T15:59-0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> ) On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 15:15, Daniel Reed wrote:
> ) > Since there does not appear to be any C++ code (.cc, .cxx, .C) in libtool,
> ) > would it be possible for the next release of libtool to not:
> ) There isn't any C code either ... it checks for various compilers so it
> ) can provide support for them (ie. you can go "libtool g++").
>
> The problem I was reporting is not so much the testing for C++ as it was the
> failing of ./configure if a C++ preprocessor was not available. There is C
> code in the various examples directories, so failing for lack of a C
> compiler might at least be reasonable.
>
That's actually an Autoconf macro that's failing, unfortunately. It's
an irritant, but I've not figured out a way of getting around it short
of overriding AC_MSG_ERROR.
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: GNU Libtool 1.5.2 released, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/01/28