[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libtool running with autoconf
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: libtool running with autoconf |
Date: |
Tue, 6 May 2003 10:26:26 -0500 (CDT) |
On Tue, 6 May 2003, Markus Werle wrote:
> Albert Chin wrote:
>
> > You installed libtool in a "non-standard" location so the above is to
> > be expected.
>
> This I do not believe.
> For a high quality package the above is unexpected.
> If even the authors of the GNU-autotools would fail to use
> it for full configuration relying on user-defined prefix
> then how can one expect others to do so.
I believe that the auto* tools expect to be installed under a common
prefix so they have common macros and boilerplate files directories.
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen
- Re: libtool running with autoconf, (continued)
- Re: libtool running with autoconf, Albert Chin, 2003/05/06
- Re: libtool running with autoconf, Markus Werle, 2003/05/06
- Re: libtool running with autoconf, Philip Willoughby, 2003/05/06
- Re: libtool running with autoconf, Markus Werle, 2003/05/06
- Re: libtool running with autoconf, Charles Wilson, 2003/05/06
- RE: aclocal search path and multiple versions of libtool (none installed in same prefix as automake), Philip Graham Willoughby, 2003/05/07
- RE: aclocal search path and multiple versions of libtool (none installed in same prefix as automake), Jeff Squyres, 2003/05/07
- RE: aclocal search path and multiple versions of libtool (none installed in same prefix as automake), Tim Mooney, 2003/05/07
- Re: aclocal search path and multiple versions of libtool (none installed in same prefix as automake), Charles Wilson, 2003/05/07
- Re: aclocal search path and multiple versions of libtool (none installed in same prefix as automake), Tim Mooney, 2003/05/08
- Re: libtool running with autoconf,
Bob Friesenhahn <=