[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: flat namespaces redux
From: |
Benjamin Reed |
Subject: |
Re: flat namespaces redux |
Date: |
Sun, 2 Feb 2003 11:27:38 -0500 |
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 11:23 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
He suggested changing it to "-multiply_defined suppress prebind",
which seems to be the solution, if libtool doesn't want to support
specifying the namespace on the libtool command-line.
This would make libtool default to making twolevel libraries (which is
darwin's linker default, in fact), but you could still pass
"-flat_namespace -undefined suppress" to the command-line if you have
a poorly behaving app.
Hrm, replying to myself, sign of a schizophrenic. =)
It was also brought up that one of the reasons for having libtool
understand namespaces is to have the ability to transition stuff that
currently depends on flat namespaces to build, but doesn't know it.
Making it an option would let us leave flat as the default, but provide
the ability to work with package maintainers to get things building
twolevel that can.
- flat namespaces redux, Benjamin Reed, 2003/02/02
- Re: flat namespaces redux,
Benjamin Reed <=
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Peter O'Gorman, 2003/02/03
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Benjamin Reed, 2003/02/03
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Peter O'Gorman, 2003/02/03
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Albert Chin, 2003/02/03
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Robert Boehne, 2003/02/04
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Yves de Champlain, 2003/02/04
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Albert Chin, 2003/02/04
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Robert Boehne, 2003/02/04
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Albert Chin, 2003/02/04
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Robert Boehne, 2003/02/04