[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libtool and 32/64-bit builds
From: |
Albert Chin |
Subject: |
Re: libtool and 32/64-bit builds |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Jul 2002 11:19:59 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 06:53:38PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Albert Chin wrote:
>
> > > What I make of it is that you didn't specify a -R option to find the
> > > library, so ld.so looks in a system directory instead. This has
> > > nothing to do with 32 vs 64 bit.
> >
> > If -R was not included on the command-line, I should have received a
> > '(file not found)' string in the ldd output. Consider the following:
>
> Not necessarily so. Since libz.so is a standard system library in
> Solaris 9, it is found by default. A -R is not required unless you
> want it to use yours rather than the system's equivalent.
If that is the case, why did I get '(file not found)' when creating a
32-bit object file? I should have received the same result, regardless
of creating a 32-bit or 64-bit object file.
--
albert chin (address@hidden)