[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Does libtool really support cross compile?
From: |
Guido Draheim |
Subject: |
Re: Does libtool really support cross compile? |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 20:18:28 +0100 |
please be a bit more specific, what cross compiler do you use?
Otherwise, 2.95.x crosscompiling does work smoothly for a lot of
platforms under my hands, but I did not check 3.0.x so far. What
version is that "libtool in gcc 3.x". I guess it is not the fault
of libtool as seen in cvs, but feel free to patch your own
libtool over there - may be use the postconfigured patch-macros
as seen in the ac-archive as a guideline. cheers, guido
Es schrieb "H . J . Lu":
>
> Does libtool really support cross compile? Libtool should never, ever set
>
> sys_lib_search_path_spec="/lib /usr/lib /usr/local/lib"
>
> when generating binaries for the cross target. The current libtool in gcc
> 3.x does it wrong. I am enclosing a patch for ltconfig here. I don't know
> how to fix libtool.
>
> H.J.
> ---
> --- ltconfig.cross Sat May 19 00:19:10 2001
> +++ ltconfig Mon Oct 29 15:02:29 2001
> @@ -2123,6 +2123,12 @@ case $ltmain in
> ;;
> esac
>
> + if test $host != $build; then
> + # Don't even think about setting sys_lib_search_path_spec for cross
> + # compiling.
> + sys_lib_search_path_spec=
> + fi
> +
> if test -z "$tagname"; then
> trap "$rm \"$ofile\"; exit 1" 1 2 15
> echo "creating $ofile"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libtool mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
-- guido Edel sei der Mensch, hilfreich und gut
GCS/E/S/P C++$++++ ULHS L++w- N++@ d(+-) s+a- r+@>+++ y++ 5++X- (geekcode)