libtool-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFT PATCH v3 0/9] Sysroot patches


From: Charles Wilson
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v3 0/9] Sysroot patches
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:00:43 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666

On 7/31/2010 4:23 PM, Charles Wilson wrote:
> I then did a complete (native) test run on linux, using libtool from
> before this series (*) and after.  In both cases all of the old tests
> passed.  However, the new testsuite, not so much:
> 
> - 37: Link order test             ok
> - 38: Link order of deplibs       ok
> + 37: Link order test             FAILED (link-order.at:87)
> + 38: Link order of deplibs       FAILED (link-order2.at:123)
> 
> I expect similar behavior on cygwin native (the "after" test run has not
> yet completed, but it did fail #37 and #38).  I reply to this post
> confirming those results when it gets finished.

As expected, the cygwin test results are as follows:

old:
All 122 tests passed

new:
 37: Link order test                       FAILED (link-order.at:87)
 38: Link order of deplibs                 FAILED (link-order2.at:123)
111: Run tests with low max_cmd_len        FAILED (cmdline_wrap.at:43)
112: override pic_flag at configure time   FAILED (pic_flag.at:48)

111 is a dup of 37/38; 112 has been discussed before and should be
skipped on non-ELF.  That leaves 37/38 which are apparently
cross-platform issues with Paolo's patch series.  I haven't tried to
bisect it to determine exactly which patch of the series to blame it on.

However, this doesn't get Ralf off the hook for his review.

--
Chuck



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]