Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions

[Bob Friesenhahn]

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> The test is currently skipped if the compiler doesn't like main.cpp
> (which already exposes this API), so we should be safe there but not
> test on as many systems as we could.  I added that for those kinds of
> issues, but primarily for the older, pre-standard C++ compilers that
> don't grok namespaces etc.
>
> A missing throw() on virtual what() is a violation of ISO C++98 however.

I don't think that pre-standard C++ compilers are much of a concern.

Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/