Re: don't rely on recursive copy for libtoolize --ltdl [libtool--gary--1.0--patch-4]

[Ralf Wildenhues]

Hi Gary,

* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 03:02:36PM CET:
> 
> Okay to commit?

Untested.  But it looks ok, so yes.

Regards,
Ralf

>       As a prerequisite for being able to test an uninstalled libtoolize
>       for copying files correctly from the source tree, we must know
>       exactly which files should be copied by the --ltdl option to avoid
>       accidentally picking up compilation objects and other noise when
>       $builddir == $srcdir:
> 
>       * libltdl/loaders/Makefile.am (ltdldatadir, ltdldatafiles)
>       (install-data-local): Removed...
>       * libltdl/Makefile.am (ltdldatafiles): ...and consolidated here.
>       (show-ltdldatafiles): New rule...
>       * Makefile.am (ltdldatafiles, libtoolize): ...used to substitute
>       exactly which files are installed by libtoolize --ltdl.
>       (edit): Move pkgvmacro_DATA substitution expression...
>       (libtoolize): ...to here.
>       * libtoolize.m4sh: Use func_copy_some_files() instead of
>       func_copy_all_from_path() to copy the --ltdl option installed
>       files.
>       (pkgvltdldirs): New path variable to search for files installed by
>       --ltdl option.
>       (func_massage_pkgvltdl_files): New function to calculate the list
>       of ltdl installation files.