Re: wrapper rpath proposed fix

[Gary V. Vaughan]

Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>
> > I must admit that I have not looked at Gary's new tests to see what 
> > they are actually testing.  I will do so now.
>
>
> Gary's subdir tests seem mostly fine to me except that it may be useful 
> to instantiate a C++ template in case the C++ compiler doesn't attempt 
> output unless it has a template to instantiate.

Feel free to add something appropriate.

> There is also the problem that the C++ tests include the legacy 
> <iostream.h> (rather than <iostream>) which may cause some of the latest 
> compilers to upchuck due to use of a non-standard feature.

IIRC (and I don't always!) this was because some of the C++ compilers we
want to support barf on <iostream>.  If we need to support both, then we
need to parameterize it :-(

I only use C++ whenever hell freezes over (or if keeping my job depends
on it :-/), so I am *extremely* unlikely to trip over a C++ bug.  I
trust your judgement to DTRT here :-b

Cheers,
        Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan      ())_.  address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist   ( '/   http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker           / )=   http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author   `(_~)_   http://sources.redhat.com/autobook

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature