Re: Frustrations with libltdl 1.9g

[Bob Friesenhahn]

On Fri, 26 Nov 2004, Albert Chin wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 03:28:19PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> > LT_PREREQ(1.9g)
> > LTDL_INSTALLABLE([ltdl])
> > LT_WITH_LTDL([ltdl])
> > LT_INIT([disable-shared dlopen win32-dll])
> > LT_LANG(C++)
>
> Why do you need to specify LT_LANG? The appropriate tags should be
> grokked automatically.

As I discussed with Gary off-line, use of C++ is optional for my 
package.  As it happens, AC_PROG_CXX appears conditionally well past 
most of the libtool initialization.  Probably LT_LANG(C++) should be 
moved there as well since there is no need to configure the C++ tag if 
it will not be used.

The good news is that other than the failure to execute a program 
built in a subdirectory `in-place' I have not encountered additional 
regressions related to libtool itself.  The pain has centered on 
libltdl.

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen