Re: libtool.texi: need_lib_prefix doc

[Gary V. Vaughan]

Hi Ralf,

Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf> wrote:
Ralf>
Ralf> This description looks fishy to me: (use fixed-width font)

Gary V. Vaughan <Gary> wrote:
Gary>
Gary> Having looked at the code in ltmain.m4sh, how about using this in
Gary> libtool.texi:
Gary>
Gary> @defvar need_lib_prefix
Gary> Whether we can @code{dlopen} modules without a @samp{lib} prefix.
Gary> Set to @samp{yes} or @samp{no}.  By default, it is @samp{unknown}, which
Gary> means the same as @samp{yes}, but documents that we are not really sure
Gary> about it.  @samp{no} means that it is possible to @code{dlopen} a
Gary> module without the @samp{lib} prefix.

Ralf> Sure.  Should I check it in?

If you agree that it is better than what is there currently, then please go
right ahead :-)

Cheers,
        Gary.
-- 
Gary V. Vaughan      ())_.  address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist   ( '/   http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker           / )=   http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author   `(_~)_   http://sources.redhat.com/autobook

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature