Re: 11-csw-cygwin-wrapper-with-no-deplibs.patch

[Ralf Wildenhues]

* Charles Wilson wrote on Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 09:58:28PM CEST:
> Sometimes, a wrapper script is generated for an executable that, itself, 
> does not link against an uninstalled library.  It appears that this can 
> happen if you are building a project where
>   (1) there is a library
>   (2) there is an executable that does not, itself, link against that 
> library
*sinp*
> I don't think it is wrong to have a wrapper script for an exe that 
> *technically* doesn't need it.  But instead of checking for 
> notinst_deplib nonempty as a proxy for "did wrapper script get sourced 
> into my environment properly" a different var should be used.

Can we lessen the number of cases where wrapper scripts are created,
though?  Fairly independent of this (good) patch, not wrapping when
not necessary seems like an improvement to me.

Regards,
Ralf