Re: libtool--release--2.0 test results

[Charles Wilson]

Bob Friesenhahn wrote:

> On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Charles Wilson wrote:
>
> > Further, why is "demo-make.test" a prereq for "pdemo-inst.test"?
> >
> > Making the following changes allow pdemo-exec and pdemo-inst to work 
> > on cygwin:
>
>
> This patch is now applied to branch-2-0 and head.  It did reduce the 
> number of failed tests observed under Cygwin and MinGW.

Something wierd happened with the pdemo-inst patch.  The following 
change happened:

-func_require "demo-make" "demo/hell$EXEEXT"
+func_require "pdemo-make" "demo/hell$EXEEXT"

But the patch I sent in was

-func_require "demo-make" "demo/hell$EXEEXT"
+func_require "pdemo-make" "pdemo/hell$EXEEXT"

E.g. there were two "demo" to "pdemo" changes in the same line, not just 
one.

--
Chuck