Re: Stupid question about running tests

[Bob Friesenhahn]

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> If you mean a shell trace, then not that I'm aware of.
>
> The best way to do it is probably to put test -n "$DEBUG" && set -x in 
> tests/defs.in, and then call the tests with:
>
>   DEBUG=1 make check TESTS=blah.test
>
> Seems like something that would be useful to commit too...

Setting VERBOSE to some value already enables some output.  Maybe 
VERBOSE should accept certain designated values, one of which also 
enables shell tracing?

It seems that CVS libtool's current woes can largely be 
located/identified by enabling shell tracing.

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen