Re: [FYI] Cleanup of linux pass_all

[Scott James Remnant]

On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 04:09 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:

> On Sep  8, 2004, "Peter O'Gorman" <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > I could revert this patch, but it would not do what you want. As you
> > can see it was already pass_all on all linux variants before this
> > patch, it just didn't look like it.
> 
> Err...  I don't see ARM in the pass_all list, for one.  And, come to
> think of it, FR-V isn't either, and you definitely don't want it
> there.  AM33/2.0 isn't either, and it shouldn't.
> 
And meanwhile in the real world, a mind-bogglingly huge number of things
won't build on ARM if this isn't set to pass_all.

Scott
-- 
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part