[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FYI: libtool--devo--1.0--patch-114
From: |
Noah Misch |
Subject: |
Re: FYI: libtool--devo--1.0--patch-114 |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Aug 2004 14:45:42 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 04:33:55PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> * bootstrap: Run the bootstrap rules from a file named Makefile,
> copied from Makefile.am for fresh checkouts.
>
> --- orig/bootstrap
> +++ mod/bootstrap
> @@ -54,8 +54,10 @@
> # Building distributed files from configure is bad for automake, so we
> # generate them here, and have Makefile rules to keep them up to date:
> rm -f ./config/ltmain.sh ./m4/ltversion.m4
> +test -f Makefile || { makefile=Makefile; cp Makefile.am $makefile; }
> make -f Makefile.am ./config/ltmain.sh ./m4/ltversion.m4 \
> top_srcdir=. PACKAGE="$2" VERSION="$3"
> +test -z "$makefile" || rm -f "$makefile"
Is this not a no-op since the intervening line still has ``-f Makefile.am''?
> --- orig/m4/libtool.m4
> +++ mod/m4/libtool.m4
> @@ -1545,8 +1545,8 @@
> striplib="$STRIP -x"
> AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])
> else
> - AC_MSG_RESULT([no])
> -fi
> + AC_MSG_RESULT([no])
> + fi
(A trivial cleanup that does not need a ChangeLog mention, I take it?)