[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: molehill ----> mountain
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: molehill ----> mountain |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:38:39 -0600 (CST) |
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Gary V.Vaughan wrote:
> Now that we don't RTLD_GLOBAL anymore there is no reason for internal
> apis
> to leak into libltdl clients... :-)
You are missing the distinction between libltdl and the modules it
loads. Global symbols from libltdl will always permeate dependent
applications. :-)
> > In some ways the macroized version looks cleaner.
>
> Okay, I went overboard. I think HEAD has too much code between
> LT_EREALLOC
> and sbrk. I think my patch 100 has too little. Lets see if 100bis is
> less
> controversial ;-)
I agree that the original macros were obtuse. 100bis it is.
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen
Re: 110-gary-rationalise-memory-management.patch, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/03/31