Re: latest cygwin patches

[Charles Wilson]

Bob Friesenhahn wrote:


> > > In a followup, I will post the "rest" of Marius' patch (e.g. the portion
> > > that is NOT already in CVS and NOT included in the patch here) for
> > > others to review.
>
> I can not find a good reason to apply this patch.

Fair enough.  I just wanted to be clear about which parts of Marius' 
posting I was taking, and which parts I was not.  I have no opinion on 
the rejected patches, and was not advocating them.  I'll leave that to 
Marius.

--Chuck