libtool-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LT_AC_PROG_SED


From: Albert Chin
Subject: Re: LT_AC_PROG_SED
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:11:44 -0600
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 05:00:04PM -0600, Robert Boehne wrote:
> OK, I fixed this little problem and tested to prove the
> changes.  Checking in to HEAD.

Index: libtool.m4
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/libtool/libtool/libtool.m4,v
retrieving revision 1.246
diff -u -3 -p -r1.246 libtool.m4
--- libtool.m4  29 Jan 2002 22:58:35 -0000      1.246
+++ libtool.m4  29 Jan 2002 23:09:58 -0000
@@ -5371,12 +5375,6 @@ $debug ||
     cat /dev/null > "$tmp/sed.in"
     _count=0
     echo $ECHO_N "0123456789$ECHO_C" >"$tmp/sed.in"
-    # Check for GNU sed and select it if it is found.
-    if "${_sed}" --version 2>&1 < /dev/null | egrep '(GNU)' > /dev/null;
-then
-      lt_cv_path_SED=${_sed}
-      break;
-    fi
     while true; do
       cat "$tmp/sed.in" "$tmp/sed.in" >"$tmp/sed.tmp"
       mv "$tmp/sed.tmp" "$tmp/sed.in"

Why special-case GNU sed? And, if you decide to leave it in, the
'then' should be on the same line as the if.

-- 
albert chin (address@hidden)



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]