[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Potential of the Sleepycat License
|
From: |
Adonay Felipe Nogueira |
|
Subject: |
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Potential of the Sleepycat License |
|
Date: |
Fri, 21 Apr 2017 22:39:13 -0300 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
LGPL is copyleft, but the copyleft "preservation" part is required
mainly when the user makes changes to the original (LGPL'd) work
*itself*, this is why it's a weak copyleft license, while a simple
dependency on the LGPL'd work wouldn't need to carry the same or
compatible license (unless if statically linked, if I'm not mistaken).
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Potential of the Sleepycat License, (continued)
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Potential of the Sleepycat License, Bob Jonkman, 2017/04/16
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Potential of the Sleepycat License, Nicolás A . Ortega, 2017/04/16
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Potential of the Sleepycat License, Adam Van Ymeren, 2017/04/16
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Potential of the Sleepycat License, Nicolás A . Ortega, 2017/04/17
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Potential of the Sleepycat License, Bob Jonkman, 2017/04/16
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Potential of the Sleepycat License, Nicolás A . Ortega, 2017/04/17
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Potential of the Sleepycat License, Adonay Felipe Nogueira, 2017/04/17
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Potential of the Sleepycat License, Nicolás A . Ortega, 2017/04/18
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Potential of the Sleepycat License,
Adonay Felipe Nogueira <=
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Potential of the Sleepycat License, Ineiev, 2017/04/22
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Potential of the Sleepycat License, Nicolás A . Ortega, 2017/04/22
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Potential of the Sleepycat License, Michael Pagan, 2017/04/16
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Potential of the Sleepycat License, Nicolás A . Ortega, 2017/04/17