[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Liberty-eiffel Digest, Vol 53, Issue 5
From: |
Hans Zwakenberg |
Subject: |
Re: Liberty-eiffel Digest, Vol 53, Issue 5 |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Feb 2022 13:13:07 +0100 (CET) |
yes, we want to make it as simple as possible, but not any simpler... :)
I'll take steps towards c-runtime simplification. For now, I'm not throwing
out DOS just yet, as many Intel-based controller boards may be using a
derivative of DOS. About keeping DOS for now, I'd appreciate feedback from our
user-base and/or readership.
cheers
Hans
> liberty-eiffel-request@gnu.org hat am 12.02.2022 18:00 geschrieben:
>
>
> Send Liberty-eiffel mailing list submissions to
> liberty-eiffel@gnu.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/liberty-eiffel
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> liberty-eiffel-request@gnu.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> liberty-eiffel-owner@gnu.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Liberty-eiffel digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: C-compiler support? (Raphael Mack)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2022 11:17:18 +0100
> From: Raphael Mack <ramack@raphael-mack.de>
> To: liberty-eiffel@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: C-compiler support?
> Message-ID:
> <c13fdac2e6131a224fba6b4fad5f94c6a69aef31.camel@raphael-mack.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> A system is perfect if you can't remove anything from it :-)
>
> Not always but in this case I would go for removing everything that
> simplifies debugging, our life, whatever, as long as nobody is using
> it.
>
> After 3 Days now I would say we can safely remove everything expect x86
> (32 and 64 bit variants) and PPC.
>
> Thanks for taking care Hans,
> Rapha
>
> Am Mittwoch, dem 09.02.2022 um 15:23 +0530 schrieb Krishna:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 9 Feb 2022, 14:48 Hans Zwakenberg, <hz@ocean-consulting.de>
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Group,
> > >
> > > do we really continue to support CRAY, RS6000, PowerPC, HP9000,
> > > VAX, SPARC, MC68000, NS32000, etc.?
> > >
> > > The C-runtime (esp. base.h and base.c) could be so much simpler
> > > and easier to validate when support for all of the above legacy
> > > systems were dropped? Is there any merit in keeping that old
> > > stuff?
> >
> > Maybe just keep PowerPC?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > --krishna
> > >
> > >
> > > cheers
> > > Hans
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Liberty-eiffel mailing list
> Liberty-eiffel@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/liberty-eiffel
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Liberty-eiffel Digest, Vol 53, Issue 5
> *********************************************
- Re: Liberty-eiffel Digest, Vol 53, Issue 5,
Hans Zwakenberg <=