[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Liberty-eiffel] Closures
From: |
Raphael Mack |
Subject: |
Re: [Liberty-eiffel] Closures |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Nov 2013 22:32:44 +0100 |
Hi,
oh Cyril, you're so great!
In the wiki you wrote:
"access is read-only: you cannot assign to an outside local variable
(and, of course, to an argument, but that's standard Eiffel anyway)"
What is the rational for this? - I like the rule, but when we have it,
wouldn't it be inline to also forbid feature calls with (observable)
side effect on the outer variables? - Yes, we do not have a concept of
"pure" features in Liberty, but may be we would like to have it once? Or
now?
Cheers,
Rapha
On Di, 2013-11-19 at 15:59 +0100, Cyril ADRIAN wrote:
> All,
>
>
> I started Bell implementations, esp. inline agents as closures.
>
>
> Of course, the work is only begun. It currently lies only in my public
> Github repo and is not pushed in Savannah yet.
>
>
> I also added a little explanation of what I intend to do in the wiki.
> See: http://wiki.liberty-eiffel.org/index.php/Agent#Inline_agents
>
> Feel free to comment.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Cyril ADRIAN (from office)
> To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider whether
> defending the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign or
> domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example.
>
>
> Google+ Posts
> My latest G+: Liberty Eiffel
> adler-rc1 is out!
> My G+ - Posts - Add to Circles -
> 21:01 Nov-05
> Get this email app!
>
> Get a signature like this. CLICK HERE.
>