[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reviewing Hurd-on-L4 (and considering its future?)
From: |
Richard Braun |
Subject: |
Re: Reviewing Hurd-on-L4 (and considering its future?) |
Date: |
Fri, 25 May 2018 14:52:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:49:00PM +0200, Paul Boddie wrote:
> Doesn't Fiasco.OC provide sufficient object capability support, or is the
> "OC"
> labelling not accurate according to certain criteria? (I can envisage people
> having differing ideas about capability systems.)
>
> "Object-oriented capability system - Unified universal mechanism for naming,
> authorization and communication control"
>
> http://l4re.org/fiasco/features.html
Yeah I'm not too familiar with all L4 variants, but this one does seem
to provide object capabilities.
--
Richard Braun
Re: Reviewing Hurd-on-L4 (and considering its future?), Richard Braun, 2018/05/24