[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: machine owner (was: Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-
From: |
olafBuddenhagen |
Subject: |
Re: machine owner (was: Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement) |
Date: |
Tue, 2 May 2006 19:16:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 |
Hi,
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 11:57:45PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 07:56:46PM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> > This is one thing the TPM is supposed to make harder, on the premise
> > that the user can check what variant of the OS exactly is installed. Too
> > bad it is not really feasible in an overwhelming majority of situations
> > in practice.
>
> I'm actually quite happy about that. :-)
Yes, I was being sarcastic :-)
-antrik-
- Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, (continued)
- Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/05/01
- Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/05/02
- On the Requirements of Leadership, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/05/02
- Re: On the Requirements of Leadership, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/05/02
- Re: On the Requirements of Leadership, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/02
- Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/05/01
Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/01
Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/01
Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/01
Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/01