[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd and microkernels (was: Re: A simple question)
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: Hurd and microkernels (was: Re: A simple question) |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:23:45 -0400 |
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 06:06 +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> (As an interesting side note, I can't think of a *single* example of a
> system built on a third party microkernel, that ever gained any
> commercial, academic or other relevance -- besides of serving as bad
> examples, of course ;-) )
I do not care for Mach, but it is certainly a counter-example to this
statement. Also, nearly every widely shipped embedded system is a
counter-example.
RE: A simple question, Jayabalan_Aaron, 2006/04/11
- Re: A simple question, Bas Wijnen, 2006/04/11
- Re: A simple question, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/04/12
- Re: A simple question, Bas Wijnen, 2006/04/13
- Re: A simple question, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/13
- Re: A simple question, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/04/15
- Hurd and microkernels (was: Re: A simple question), olafBuddenhagen, 2006/04/15
- Re: Hurd and microkernels (was: Re: A simple question),
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- Re: Hurd and microkernels (was: Re: A simple question), bahadir balban, 2006/04/17
- Re: Hurd and microkernels (was: Re: A simple question), Pierre THIERRY, 2006/04/15
- Re: Hurd and microkernels, Kristoffer Nyborg Gregertsen, 2006/04/15
Re: Hurd and microkernels, Tom Bachmann, 2006/04/18
Re: Hurd and microkernels, Barry deFreese, 2006/04/18
Re: A simple question, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/04/15
Re: A simple question, Bas Wijnen, 2006/04/15
Re: A simple question, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/04/12
Re: A simple question, MT Rezaie, 2006/04/13