[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: POSIX Layer, Stronger Chassis (Was: Re: Compatibility)
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: Fwd: POSIX Layer, Stronger Chassis (Was: Re: Compatibility) |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Oct 2005 20:46:34 -0400 |
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 02:31 +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Microsoft didn't do any of those, you must be from a different
> universe if you honestly claim that...
>
> And can we stick to free systems? We can't look at how non-free ones
> are implemented, examine their documentation, how the tools behave
> etc.
It is true that we cannot examine the code of non-free systems. However,
we can observe how they operate, what users like about them, and how
they were marketed, and learn valuable lessons from this.
Anyone who does not learn from their competitors in every way possible
is an idiot.
shap
- POSIX Layer, Stronger Chassis (Was: Re: Compatibility), William Grim, 2005/10/25
- Message not available
- Fwd: POSIX Layer, Stronger Chassis (Was: Re: Compatibility), Justin Emmanuel, 2005/10/25
- Re: Fwd: POSIX Layer, Stronger Chassis (Was: Re: Compatibility), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/25
- Re: Fwd: POSIX Layer, Stronger Chassis (Was: Re: Compatibility),
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- Re: Fwd: POSIX Layer, Stronger Chassis (Was: Re: Compatibility), Justin Emmanuel, 2005/10/26
- Re: Fwd: POSIX Layer, Stronger Chassis (Was: Re: Compatibility), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/26
- Re: Fwd: POSIX Layer, Stronger Chassis (Was: Re: Compatibility), Paavo Parkkinen, 2005/10/26
- Re: Fwd: POSIX Layer, Stronger Chassis (Was: Re: Compatibility), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/26
- Re: Fwd: POSIX Layer, Stronger Chassis (Was: Re: Compatibility), Paavo Parkkinen, 2005/10/27
Re: POSIX Layer, Stronger Chassis (Was: Re: Compatibility), Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/25