[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Task destruction
From: |
Wolfgang Jährling |
Subject: |
Re: Task destruction |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Aug 2002 22:14:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.0.1i |
Wolfgang Jährling <address@hidden> wrote:
> When creating a new task, we would usually specify our own proc server
> as the "master" (i.e. the task we will get from getproc (), which I just
> assume we will, as an object handle alone is never enough).
The terminology I used here was wrong. A "handle" (on the user side)
refers to the combination of target server and the id given out by him,
not only to the id.
Cheers,
GNU/Wolfgang
--
Wolfgang Jährling <address@hidden> \\ http://stdio.cjb.net/
Debian GNU/Hurd user && Debian GNU/Linux user \\ http://www.gnu.org/
The Hurd Hacking Guide: http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hacking-guide/
["We're way ahead of you here. The Hurd has always been on the ]
[ cutting edge of not being good for anything." -- Roland McGrath ]
- Task destruction, Wolfgang Jährling, 2002/08/05
- Re: Task destruction, Niels Möller, 2002/08/05
- Re: Task destruction, Wolfgang Jährling, 2002/08/05
- Re: Task destruction,
Wolfgang Jährling <=
- Re: Task destruction, Niels Möller, 2002/08/05
- Re: Task destruction, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/08/05
- Re: Task destruction, Roland McGrath, 2002/08/05
- Re: Task destruction, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/08/05
- Re: Task destruction, Roland McGrath, 2002/08/05
- Re: Task destruction, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/08/05
- Re: Task destruction, Roland McGrath, 2002/08/05
- Re: Task destruction, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/08/05
- Re: Task destruction, Niels Möller, 2002/08/06
- Re: Task destruction, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/08/06