[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pthread assumption + starting real port
From: |
OKUJI Yoshinori |
Subject: |
Re: Pthread assumption + starting real port |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Nov 2000 18:23:11 +0900 |
From: Johan Rydberg <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: Pthread assumption + starting real port
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 09:55:38 +0100
> Maybe we could use Flick from Utah.
Even though L4-KA people realized that Flick was not very good?
Another problem is that Flick doesn't implement all of MiG/Mach
features. I don't know if this is because Flick supports Mach 3
instead of Mach 4 (I haven't looked at the internals yet), but if we
migrate from MiG to another IDL, this is not a problem.
Okuji
- Re: Pthread assumption + starting real port, (continued)
- Re: Pthread assumption + starting real port, Farid Hajji, 2000/11/15
- Re: Pthread assumption + starting real port, Johan Rydberg, 2000/11/15
- Re: Pthread assumption + starting real port, Niels Möller, 2000/11/16
- Re: Pthread assumption + starting real port, Johan Rydberg, 2000/11/16
- Re: Pthread assumption + starting real port, OKUJI Yoshinori, 2000/11/16
- Re: Pthread assumption + starting real port, Niels Möller, 2000/11/16
- Re: Pthread assumption + starting real port, OKUJI Yoshinori, 2000/11/16
- Re: Pthread assumption + starting real port, Johan Rydberg, 2000/11/17
- Re: Pthread assumption + starting real port,
OKUJI Yoshinori <=
Re: Pthread assumption + starting real port, Farid Hajji, 2000/11/16