Re: Does the most recent Mailcrypt support something else than inline PGP?

[Merciadri Luca]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes:

> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:58:57 +0200, Merciadri wrote:
>
>> asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes:
>
>>> Why do you insist on using Mailcrypt?
>
>> Well, one of my fundamental principles is that when something works as
>> I want it to, I do not change this `something' for something else. Why
>> not using Mailcrypt? It is still maintained, and it suits my needs! :)
>
> a) Your signature separator keeps being broken (despite the lengthy
> previous debate), b) You apparantly can't make it do non-inline PGP.
>
> That is how you want it?
No. Clearly.
>
> This is literally all the configuration I have in Gnus to use epg:
>
>   (setq mm-verify-option 'known
>         mm-decrypt-option 'known)
>   (setq gnus-buttonized-mime-types '("multipart/signed" 
> "multipart/encrypted"))
>
> ... and that stuff is highly optional.
Well, if I try this, my Gnus can't find my news-server anymore. Weird.
- -- 
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/
- -- 

Fall down seven times, stand up eight. 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iEYEARECAAYFAkwlr2UACgkQM0LLzLt8Mhy1eQCfb5Jh9mk7gx/ZjRwH7t3t4dSd
FfUAnA5GPb7Klu7zMqXdAEOni5MIbadb
=yzBb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----